Wii eS A eas YALH ALUMNI WEEKLY YALE ALUMNI WEEKLY SUBSCRIPTION, - $3.00 PER YEAR. Foreign Postage, 40 cents per year. PAYABLE IN ADVANCE. Single copies, ten cents each. For rates for papers in quantity, address the office. All orders for papers should be paid for in advance. Checks, drafts and orders should be made payable to the Yale Alumni Weekly. All correspondence should be addressed,— Yale Alumni Weekly, New Haven, Conn. The office is at Room 6, White Hall. ADVISORY BOARD. H. C. Roprnson, 58. J.R. SHEFFIELD, ’87. W. W. Skippy, ’65S. J. A. HARTWELL, '89 8. C. P. LinpsLey, 758. L. S. WELCH, ’89. W. Camp, ’80. E. VAN INGEN, ’91 S. W.G. DaaaGeETT, ’80. P. Jay, ‘92. EDITOR. Lewis 8S. WELCH, ’89. ASSOCIATE EDITOR. WALTER Camp, ’80. ASSISTANT EDITOR. E. J. THompson, Sp. NEWS EDITOR. FRED. M. Davrzs, ’99. ASSISTANT. PRESTON KuUMLER, 1900. BUSINESS DEPARTMENT ASSISTANTS. O. M. CuaRK, ’98. BURNETT GOODWIN, ’99 S. Entered as second class matter at New Haven P. 0. NEW HAVEN, Conn., Dec. 15, 1898. THE DEBATING VICTORY. In the face of great natural difficul- ties, Yale, through the hard working of her students and the faithful codpera- ‘tion of those of greater years, has won a most excellent victory on the plat- form. We congratulate those who won it and those who helped them to win it. There is no particular reason for con- gratulating the student body of Yale. The support at the debate in the way of attendance was not good. The audi- ence was unworthily small. Wouldn’t debate fare better at Yale if the chance to secure the opportunities of a membership in the Union, or a place at the banquet, were not offered so freely? Isn’t debate made too cheap? ~ —— eer. Wale’s Victory. [Editoriai in Yale News.] Another splendid victory has been placed to Yale’s credit by her defeat of Princeton in the fifth annual de- bate between the two Universities. It was a struggle to determine a tempor- ary supremacy, since each had hitherto won two contests; and Yale proved equal to the occasion. In point of logic and strength of argument the speeches of our representatives showed a remark- able degree of perfection and a thor- ough mastery of the subject. Their re- buttals, where, on account of their com- parative inexperience, our men might have been expected to weaken, have sel- dom been surpassed in the history of intercollegiate debating. Princeton, however, was. far from easily van- quished. Her team was composed of men who were worthy opponents in every respect. Their delivery was superb; they fought well. But they were unable to maintain their ground successfully. For Messrs. Kitchel, Leavitt and Walcott the University has naught but words of commendation and of praise, and for their untiring loyalty and conscientious efforts they have our sincere gratitude. — é wa _S Regretted at Princeton. [Editorial in Princetonian.] Princeton’s defeat last night at the hands of Yale in the first of the inter- collegiate debates this year is regretted. x * * * * Heretofore Princeton has held her own against Yale, and owing to the disproportion numerically between the two colleges a considerate public has awarded the first place to Princeton; but last night’s defeat has materially changed this phase of the question, and Princeton is again behind in the race. There is one way, only, by which the stigma of the present defeat may be partially removed, and that is by defeating Harvard, who is popularly considered the champion in argumenta- tive contests. e