HARVARD LETTER. Disappointment over the Debate—A Democratic Victory—The Hs. Cambridge, Dec. 4.—The outcome of the annual debate with Yale last evening came as a surprise and a disappoint- ment to the students at Cambridge. Owing to the fact that the contest was held at New Haven, less interest was aroused than last year, when the meet- ing was in Sanders’ Theatre. But in the debating societies the result was eagerly anticipated. The activity of these societies seems to increase yearly and the successive defeats have been keenly felt. Many of the students had collected in front of the office of the Crimson to learn the result. The general verdict on the cause of the de- feat seems to be that Harvard had the wrong side of the question. Little is heard in criticism of the men who rep- resented the Universitv. The Crimson, in its editorial comment on the debate says: “The Harvard speakers, though they have failed to re- assert superiority over Yale’s steadily increasing strength in debating, have nevertheless done all that lay in their power to prepare themselves thoroughly and the College may feel confident that their effort was in no way discreditable.”’ At the same time that the intercol- legiate debate was being held in New Haven, the Union and the Forum held the second of their inter-club debates of the year on the question, “Resolved, That the present system of no-license should be maintained in Cambridge.” The Union supported. the affirmative and was awarded the decision. A DEMOCRATIC REFORM. A movement to bring about a change in the method of electing Class Day officers in the Senior class was started some weeks ago.by W. S. Youngman, a graduate now studying in the Law School, and the proposed change was approved by the class at a special meet- ing called last Thursday evening. This meeting to elect the Class Day officers has been for many years the great con- test of the undergraduate course.